Change crl-storer to only require that 1 of the IssuingDistributionPoint
URIs remain consistent between consecutive CRLs in the same sequence.
This allows us to add and remove IDP URIs, so we can change our IDP
scheme over time.
To facilitate this, also move all code which builds or parses IDP
extensions into a single place, so that we don't have to have multiple
definitions of the same types and similar code in many places.
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/7340
Part of https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/7296
* Allows the ceremony tool to add the `onlyContainsCACerts` flag to the
`IssuingDistributionPoint` extension[1] for CRLs.
* Add a lint to detect basic usage of this new flag.
* Add a helper function which doesn't (yet) exist in golang
x/crypto/cryptobyte named `ReadOptionalASN1BooleanWithTag` which
searches for an optional DER-encoded ASN.1 element tagged with a given
tag e.g. onlyContainsUserCerts and reports values back to the caller.
* Each revoked certificate in the CRL config is checked for is `IsCA` to
maintain conformance with RFC 5280 Section 6.3.3 b.2.iii [2].
> (iii) If the onlyContainsCACerts boolean is asserted in the
> IDP CRL extension, verify that the certificate
> includes the basic constraints extension with the cA
> boolean asserted.
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/7047
1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5280#section-5.2.5
2. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5280#section-6.3.3
Delete our forked version of the x509 library, and update all call-sites
to use the version that we upstreamed and got released in go1.21. This
requires making a few changes to calling code:
- replace crl_x509.RevokedCertificate with x509.RevocationListEntry
- replace RevocationList.RevokedCertificates with
RevocationList.RevokedCertificateEntries
- make RevocationListEntry.ReasonCode a non-pointer integer
Our lints cannot yet be updated to use the new types and fields, because
those improvements have not yet been adopted by the zcrypto/x509 package
used by the linting framework.
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/6741
Update zlint to v3.5.0, which introduces scaffolding for running lints
over CRLs.
Convert all of our existing CRL checks to structs which match the zlint
interface, and add them to the registry. Then change our linter's
CheckCRL function, and crl-checker's Validate function, to run all lints
in the zlint registry.
Finally, update the ceremony tool to run these lints as well.
This change touches a lot of files, but involves almost no logic
changes. It's all just infrastructure, changing the way our lints and
their tests are shaped, and moving test files into new homes.
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/6934
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/6979
Back when CRL capabilities were first introduced to the Boulder
codebase for the sake of the `ceremony` tool, they weren't available
in the version of the Go compiler and standard library used by
Boulder at that time. So the CRL capabilities from go1.15 were
backported verbatim into our own `x509crl` library.
This is no longer necessary, as go1.17.5 is our lowest supported
version.
Part of #5681
The resulting `boulder` binary can be invoked by different names to
trigger the behavior of the relevant subcommand. For instance, symlinking
and invoking as `boulder-ca` acts as the CA. Symlinking and invoking as
`boulder-va` acts as the VA.
This reduces the .deb file size from about 200MB to about 20MB.
This works by creating a registry that maps subcommand names to `main`
functions. Each subcommand registers itself in an `init()` function. The
monolithic `boulder` binary then checks what name it was invoked with
(`os.Args[0]`), looks it up in the registry, and invokes the appropriate
`main`. To avoid conflicts, all of the old `package main` are replaced
with `package notmain`.
To get the list of registered subcommands, run `boulder --list`. This
is used when symlinking all the variants into place, to ensure the set
of symlinked names matches the entries in the registry.
Fixes#5692