Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Aaron Gable 6071bedb52
Use PKIMetal to lint CRLs in CI (#8061)
Add a new custom lint which sends CRLs to PKIMetal, and configure it to
run in our integration test environment. Factor out most of the code
used to talk to the PKIMetal API so that it can be shared by the two
custom lints which do so. Add the ability to configure lints to the
CRLProfileConfig, so that zlint knows where to load the necessary custom
config from.
2025-03-14 16:28:56 -07:00
Aaron Gable 358bdab8f4
Replace pkilint with pkimetal in CI (#8058)
Replace the bpkilint container with a new bpkimetal container. Update
our custom lint which calls out to that API to speak PKIMetal's (very
similar) protocol instead. Update our zlint custom configuration to
configure this updated lint.

Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/8009
2025-03-12 12:21:40 -07:00
Jacob Hoffman-Andrews a8b2fd6960
test: increase pkilint timeout (#8008)
Increase pkilint timeout from 200ms to 2s. In #8006 I found that errors
were stemming from timeouts talking to the bpkilint container. These
probably showed up in TestRevocation particularly because that
integration test now issues for many certificates in parallel. Pkilint's
slowness, combined with the relatively small number of cores in CI,
probably resulted in some requests taking too long.
2025-02-12 10:10:02 -08:00
Aaron Gable 939ac1be8f
Add pkilint to CI via custom zlint (#7441)
Add a new "LintConfig" item to the CA's config, which can point to a
zlint configuration toml file. This allows lints to be configured, e.g.
to control the number of rounds of factorization performed by the Fermat
factorization lint.

Leverage this new config to create a new custom zlint which calls out to
a configured pkilint API endpoint. In config-next integration tests,
configure the lint to point at a new pkilint docker container.

This approach has three nice forward-looking features: we now have the
ability to configure any of our lints; it's easy to expand this
mechanism to lint CRLs when the pkilint API has support for that; and
it's easy to enable this new lint if we decide to stand up a pkilint
container in our production environment.

No production configuration changes are necessary at this time.

Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/7430
2024-04-30 09:29:26 -07:00
Aaron Gable cb28a001e9
Unfork crl x509 (#7078)
Delete our forked version of the x509 library, and update all call-sites
to use the version that we upstreamed and got released in go1.21. This
requires making a few changes to calling code:
- replace crl_x509.RevokedCertificate with x509.RevocationListEntry
- replace RevocationList.RevokedCertificates with
RevocationList.RevokedCertificateEntries
- make RevocationListEntry.ReasonCode a non-pointer integer

Our lints cannot yet be updated to use the new types and fields, because
those improvements have not yet been adopted by the zcrypto/x509 package
used by the linting framework.

Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/6741
2023-09-15 20:25:13 -07:00
Aaron Gable b090ffbd2e
Use zlint to check our CRLs (#6972)
Update zlint to v3.5.0, which introduces scaffolding for running lints
over CRLs.

Convert all of our existing CRL checks to structs which match the zlint
interface, and add them to the registry. Then change our linter's
CheckCRL function, and crl-checker's Validate function, to run all lints
in the zlint registry.

Finally, update the ceremony tool to run these lints as well.

This change touches a lot of files, but involves almost no logic
changes. It's all just infrastructure, changing the way our lints and
their tests are shaped, and moving test files into new homes.

Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/6934
Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/6979
2023-07-11 15:39:05 -07:00