boulder

History

Phil Porada 439517543b CI: Run staticcheck standalone (#7055 ) Run staticcheck as a standalone binary rather than as a library via golangci-lint. From the golangci-lint help out, > staticcheck (megacheck): It's a set of rules from staticcheck. It's not the same thing as the staticcheck binary. The author of staticcheck doesn't support or approve the use of staticcheck as a library inside golangci-lint. We decided to disable ST1000 which warns about incorrect or missing package comments. For SA4011, I chose to change the semantics[1] of the for loop rather than ignoring the SA4011 lint for that line. Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/6988 1. https://go.dev/ref/spec#Continue_statements	2023-08-31 21:09:40 -07:00
..
mailer.go	CI: Run staticcheck standalone (#7055 )	2023-08-31 21:09:40 -07:00
mailer_test.go	Use io and os instead of deprecated ioutil (#6286 )	2022-08-10 13:30:17 -07:00

Run staticcheck as a standalone binary rather than as a library via
golangci-lint. From the golangci-lint help out,
> staticcheck (megacheck): It's a set of rules from staticcheck. It's
not the same thing as the staticcheck binary. The author of staticcheck
doesn't support or approve the use of staticcheck as a library inside
golangci-lint.

We decided to disable ST1000 which warns about incorrect or missing
package comments.

For SA4011, I chose to change the semantics[1] of the for loop rather
than ignoring the SA4011 lint for that line.

Fixes https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/issues/6988

1. https://go.dev/ref/spec#Continue_statements

2023-08-31 21:09:40 -07:00

mailer.go

CI: Run staticcheck standalone (#7055 )

2023-08-31 21:09:40 -07:00

mailer_test.go

Use io and os instead of deprecated ioutil (#6286 )

2022-08-10 13:30:17 -07:00