- Improve the error message that shows up when there is a race
from doing require(esm) and import(esm) at the same time.
- Improve error message of ERR_REQUIRE_ASYNC_MODULE by showing
parent and target file names, if available.
Drive-by: split the require(tla) tests since we are modifying
the tests already.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/57126
Refs: https://github.com/fisker/prettier-issue-17139
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Files in `node_modules` are not authored by the user directly and the
original sources are less relevant to the user.
Skipping source maps in `node_modules` improves the general
performance. Add `module.setSourceMapsSupport(enabled, options)` to
skip source maps in `node_modules` if it is needed. This moves
all source maps related API to `node:module` and this a step to
promote the source maps API to stable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56639
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Carlos Espa <43477095+Ceres6@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56499
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/56183
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
This tracks the asynchronicity in the ModuleWraps when they turn out to
contain TLA after instantiation, and throw the right error
(ERR_REQUIRE_ASYNC_MODULE) when it's required again. It removes
the freezing of ModuleWraps since it's not meaningful to freeze
this when the rest of the module loader is mutable, and we
can record the asynchronicity in the ModuleWrap right after
compilation after we get a V8 upgrade that contains
v8::Module::HasTopLevelAwait() instead of searching through
the module graph repeatedly which can be slow.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55520
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/55516
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52697
Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
When a ESM module cannot be loaded by require due to the presence
of TLA, its module status would be stopped at kInstantiated. In
this case, when it's imported again, we should allow it to be
evaluated asynchronously, as it's also a common pattern for users
to retry with dynamic import when require fails.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55502
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/55500
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52697
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55471
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jake Yuesong Li <jake.yuesong@gmail.com>
As the documentation states, the `context.importAssertion` should be
still supported and emit a warning. This is true for the `load` hook,
but not correct for context of the `resolve` hook.
This commit fixes the inconsistency.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55365
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
The two proposals reached stage 4 at the October 2024 meeting.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55333
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
This is faster and more consistent with other places using the
regular expression to detect node_modules.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55243
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53848
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
When creating an fast api the callback might use the receiver. In that
case if the internal binding is destructured the method won't have
access to the reciver and it will throw. Passing the receiver as second
argument ensures the receiver is available.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54408
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
This unflags --experimental-require-module so require(esm) can be
used without the flag. For now, when require() actually encounters
an ESM, it will still emit an experimental warning. To opt out
of the feature, --no-experimental-require-module can be used.
There are some tests specifically testing ERR_REQUIRE_ESM. Some
of them are repurposed to test --no-experimental-require-module.
Some of them are modified to just expect loading require(esm) to
work, when it's appropriate.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55085
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52697
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <livia@cirno.name>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
This patch implements a "module-sync" exports condition
for packages to supply a sycnrhonous ES module to the
Node.js module loader, no matter it's being required
or imported. This is similar to the "module" condition
that bundlers have been using to support `require(esm)`
in Node.js, and allows dual-package authors to opt into
ESM-first only newer versions of Node.js that supports
require(esm) while avoiding the dual-package hazard.
```json
{
"type": "module",
"exports": {
"node": {
// On new version of Node.js, both require() and import get
// the ESM version
"module-sync": "./index.js",
// On older version of Node.js, where "module" and
// require(esm) are not supported, use the transpiled CJS version
// to avoid dual-package hazard. Library authors can decide
// to drop support for older versions of Node.js when they think
// it's time.
"default": "./dist/index.cjs"
},
// On any other environment, use the ESM version.
"default": "./index.js"
}
}
```
We end up implementing a condition with a different name
instead of reusing "module", because existing code in the
ecosystem using the "module" condition sometimes also expect
the module resolution for these ESM files to work in CJS
style, which is supported by bundlers, but the native
Node.js loader has intentionally made ESM resolution
different from CJS resolution (e.g. forbidding `import
'./noext'` or `import './directory'`), so it would be
semver-major to implement a `"module"` condition
without implementing the forbidden ESM resolution rules.
For now, this just implments a new condition as semver-minor
so it can be backported to older LTS.
Refs: https://webpack.js.org/guides/package-exports/#target-environment-independent-packages
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54648
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52173
Refs: https://github.com/joyeecheung/test-module-condition
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52697
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Jan Krems <jan.krems@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
This lays the foundation for supporting synchronous hooks proposed
in https://github.com/nodejs/loaders/pull/198 for ESM.
- Corrects and adds several JSDoc comments for internal functions
of the ESM loader, as well as explaining how require() for
import CJS work in the special resolve/load paths. This doesn't
consolidate it with import in require(esm) yet due to caching
differences, which is left as a TODO.
- The moduleProvider passed into ModuleJob is replaced as
moduleOrModulePromise, we call the translators directly in the
ESM loader and verify it right after loading for clarity.
- Reuse a few refactored out helpers for require(esm) in
getModuleJobForRequire().
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54769
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
The synchronous CJS translator can handle entrypoints now, this
can be hit when --import is used, so lift the bogus assertions and
added tests.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54592
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/54577
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
It was intended that warnings should only be emitted for an
existing package.json without a type. This fixes a confusing
warning telling users to update /package.json when there are
no package.json on the lookup path at all, like this:
[MODULE_TYPELESS_PACKAGE_JSON] Warning: ... parsed as an ES module
because module syntax was detected; to avoid the performance penalty
of syntax detection, add "type": "module" to /package.json
Drive-by: update the warning message to be clear about
reparsing and make it clear what's actionable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54045
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>