This patch implements a "module-sync" exports condition
for packages to supply a sycnrhonous ES module to the
Node.js module loader, no matter it's being required
or imported. This is similar to the "module" condition
that bundlers have been using to support `require(esm)`
in Node.js, and allows dual-package authors to opt into
ESM-first only newer versions of Node.js that supports
require(esm) while avoiding the dual-package hazard.
```json
{
"type": "module",
"exports": {
"node": {
// On new version of Node.js, both require() and import get
// the ESM version
"module-sync": "./index.js",
// On older version of Node.js, where "module" and
// require(esm) are not supported, use the transpiled CJS version
// to avoid dual-package hazard. Library authors can decide
// to drop support for older versions of Node.js when they think
// it's time.
"default": "./dist/index.cjs"
},
// On any other environment, use the ESM version.
"default": "./index.js"
}
}
```
We end up implementing a condition with a different name
instead of reusing "module", because existing code in the
ecosystem using the "module" condition sometimes also expect
the module resolution for these ESM files to work in CJS
style, which is supported by bundlers, but the native
Node.js loader has intentionally made ESM resolution
different from CJS resolution (e.g. forbidding `import
'./noext'` or `import './directory'`), so it would be
semver-major to implement a `"module"` condition
without implementing the forbidden ESM resolution rules.
For now, this just implments a new condition as semver-minor
so it can be backported to older LTS.
Refs: https://webpack.js.org/guides/package-exports/#target-environment-independent-packages
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54648
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52173
Refs: https://github.com/joyeecheung/test-module-condition
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52697
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Jan Krems <jan.krems@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
It was intended that warnings should only be emitted for an
existing package.json without a type. This fixes a confusing
warning telling users to update /package.json when there are
no package.json on the lookup path at all, like this:
[MODULE_TYPELESS_PACKAGE_JSON] Warning: ... parsed as an ES module
because module syntax was detected; to avoid the performance penalty
of syntax detection, add "type": "module" to /package.json
Drive-by: update the warning message to be clear about
reparsing and make it clear what's actionable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54045
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Instead of using an async function wrapper, just try compiling code with
unknown module format as SourceTextModule when it cannot be compiled
as CJS and the error message indicates that it's worth a retry. If
it can be parsed as SourceTextModule then it's considered ESM.
Also, move shouldRetryAsESM() to C++ completely so that
we can reuse it in the CJS module loader for require(esm).
Drive-by: move methods that don't belong to ContextifyContext
out as static methods and move GetHostDefinedOptions to
ModuleWrap.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/52413
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/50322
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Lemire <daniel@lemire.me>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/50322
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/49869
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46305
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
It turns out that even with startup snapshots, there is a non-trivial
overhead for loading internal modules. This patch makes the loading
of the non-essential modules lazy again.
Caveat: we have to make some of the globals lazily-loaded too,
so the WPT runner is updated to test what the state of the global
scope is after the globals are accessed (and replaced with the
loaded value).
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/45659
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Daeyeon Jeong <daeyeon.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tierney Cyren <hello@bnb.im>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/44859
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jan Krems <jan.krems@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/42301
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/42305
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <mohammadkeyvanzade94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jacob Smith <3012099+JakobJingleheimer@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Harband <ljharb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Sumners <james@sumners.email>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36328
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
this commit solves a regression introduced with PR-40980.
if a resolve call results in a script with .mjs extension the
is automatically set to . This avoids the case where an additional
in the same directory as the .mjs file would declare the
to commonjs
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/41218
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/40980
Refs: https://github.com/yargs/yargs/issues/2068
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
doc: update ESM hook examples
esm: fix unsafe primordial
doc: fix ESM example linting
esm: allow source of type ArrayBuffer
doc: update ESM hook changelog to include resolve format
esm: allow all ArrayBuffers and TypedArrays for load hook source
doc: tidy code & API docs
doc: convert ESM source table header from Title Case to Sentence case
doc: add detailed explanation for getPackageType
esm: add caveat that ESMLoader::import() must NOT be renamed
esm: tidy code declaration of getFormat protocolHandlers
doc: correct ESM doc link (bad conflict resolution)
doc: update ESM hook limitation for CJS
esm: tweak preload description
doc: update ESM getPackageType() example explanation
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/37468
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webmaster@geoffreybooth.com>
There is no reason for this to be in C++. Using JavaScript means that
the code is more accessible to more developers, which is important
for any Node.js feature. This also simplifies the code significantly
in some areas. On the technical side, this potentially also enables
making some of the file system operations that are involved
asynchronous.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/32201
Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>