This PR resolves#7629
This adds javaagent instrumentation for the
[jodd-http](https://http.jodd.org/) `HttpRequest`.
It creates `Http Client Spans` and `Http Client Metrics`, the lowest
supported version is `org.jodd:jodd-http:4.2.0` (most recent: `6.3.0`),
since this is the first version of the library supporting java 8, having
follow-redirect capability and `HttpRequest#overwriteHeader()` method.
The instrumented method's signature and return type `HttpRequest#send()`
has not been modified since, and therefore the instrumentation works for
all `jodd-http` versions above `4.2.0`.
Since this is my first contribution/instrumentation, I orientated myself
on the `apache-httpclient-5.0` instrumentation, but obviously I would be
glad to get some feedback on this
---------
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Rzeszutek <mrzeszutek@splunk.com>
Basically, `akka-http` instrumenter has the responsibility to instrument
the `http.server.duration` for the Play framework application, but the
current implementation has not marked the `http.route` attribute.
ref:
8e8161cb2e/instrumentation/akka/akka-http-10.0/javaagent/src/main/java/io/opentelemetry/javaagent/instrumentation/akkahttp/server/AkkaHttpServerAttributesGetter.java (L59)
Actually, it's hard to record that attribute by only the akka-http layer
because that library's request object doesn't hold the route
information, e.g. placeholder.
So this patch delegates that job to the `play-mvc` instrumenter and when
that has been able to get the route info, the instrumenter puts
`http.route` attribute onto `http.server.duration`.
For example, when the routes configuration of the Play is like the
following:
```
GET /foo/:bar controllers.HomeController.doSomething(bar: String)
```
and when it tries to access that API, then OTEL instruments like so:
```prometheus
http_server_duration_count{otel_scope_name="io.opentelemetry.akka-http-10.0",otel_scope_version="1.23.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT",http_flavor="1.1",http_method="GET",http_route="/foo/$bar<[^/]+>",http_scheme="http",http_status_code="200",net_host_name="localhost",net_host_port="9000"} 1.0 1676078079798
http_server_duration_sum{otel_scope_name="io.opentelemetry.akka-http-10.0",otel_scope_version="1.23.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT",http_flavor="1.1",http_method="GET",http_route="/foo/$bar<[^/]+>",http_scheme="http",http_status_code="200",net_host_name="localhost",net_host_port="9000"} 12183.558843 1676078079798
http_server_duration_bucket{otel_scope_name="io.opentelemetry.akka-http-10.0",otel_scope_version="1.23.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT",http_flavor="1.1",http_method="GET",http_route="/foo/$bar<[^/]+>",http_scheme="http",http_status_code="200",net_host_name="localhost",net_host_port="9000",le="0.0"} 0.0 1676078079798
...
http_server_duration_bucket{otel_scope_name="io.opentelemetry.akka-http-10.0",otel_scope_version="1.23.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT",http_flavor="1.1",http_method="GET",http_route="/foo/$bar<[^/]+>",http_scheme="http",http_status_code="200",net_host_name="localhost",net_host_port="9000",le="+Inf"} 1.0 1676078079798
```
Rel: #1415
---------
Signed-off-by: moznion <moznion@mail.moznion.net>
Related to #7107 and #7202
Support WebFlux 6.
Supporting reactor 3.5 seems pretty straightforward, the
`subscriberContext()` was deprecated in 3.4 in favor of
`contextWrite()`. In 3.5, `subscriberContext()` was removed.
This PR doesn't bump `latestDepTestLibrary` to 3.5 yet because there are
a couple of tests that succeed in 3.4 using `contextWrite()` but fail in
3.5 using `contextWrite()`.
My proposal is to review/merge this PR, and then I can ping our resident
reactor experts to see if they have thoughts on the failing tests in
3.5.