* subsume methods from AttributesKeys to AttributeKey
* remove missed instance of AttributesKeys
* make javadoc wording more representative of method intent
* Remove Event interface, and it's usage
Based on the specification we are not required to expose this interface or have APIs that accept this interface.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Drutu <bogdandrutu@gmail.com>
* Fix links to Event
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Drutu <bogdandrutu@gmail.com>
* Fix more javadocs references to Event
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Drutu <bogdandrutu@gmail.com>
* Add a generic type for the key on the ImmutableKeyValuePairs.
This necessitated changing the `get` to `getValue` to avoid clashing with the java.util.Map interface.
Also introduced convenience sub-interfaces for consuming labels and attributes, so consumers don't have to worry about the types if they don't want to.
* Make AttributesMap not extend map, and restore the get method name for Attributes.
* key class and implementation
* key class and implementation
* The code compiles
* little tweaks
* some cleanup, tests are passing
* remove AttributeValue and clean up misc. references to it.
* clean up some unused bits
* add a TODO
* a bit of cleanup; fix a todo
* update for changes from the main branch
* Change method to get the underlying key.
Move the key creators to a AttributesKeys class.
Hide the implementation classes and replace with interface use.
* use autovalue for the key implementations
* fix javadoc issues
* update benchmark keys, and a few tweaks from PR review
* Add javadoc notes to encourage using the lower-overhead attribute options.
* Add javadoc clarifying subclass responsibilities around empty keys.
* make the compareTo on AttributeKeyImpl null-safe, for extra safety
* fix formatting
* switch to java 8
* update the READMEs and use Object.equals in a couple of cases to test that we're really compiling for java 8/android 24.
* formatting
* use the newer release options for the build, and change the int test to not be java 7 any more.
* switch back to source/target compatibility
* sure wish I could run docker locally to test this out.
Anuraag Agrawal