I originally tried to fixrancher/rancher#24704 without completely
special casing. Unfortunately that lead to other issues:
rancher/rancher#24745rancher/rancher#24794rancher/rancher#24814
I decided to revert all of the related changes and to just special
case this one instance. Ultimately I think the removeEmpty is the
culprit but it requires backend changes in order to properly fix
and those changes are not happening right now.
We were erroneously adding cloud_provider.awsCloudProvider on
digital ocean etc due to rancher/rancher#24515.
This change assumes that the presence of
onfig.rancher_kubernetes_engine_config.cloud_provider.name
implies that the cloud_provider should be present. If that
nested field isn't present we remove cloud_provider.
rancher/rancher#24745
While editing a cluster properly support .x kube version comparisons when
filtering out cluster template revisions.
Coercing a .x version converts it to a .0 which made the revision look like
it was a kube downgrade. By making use of .satisfies when the revision
kube version ends with a '.x' we're now better able to check if the
kube version is a downgrade and filter appropriately.
rancher/rancher#23489
the check-override-allowed component did not know how to deal with the k8s
version question because of its tri state and how we deal with the patch version
that is an override but not really an override. I added a check to verify the
mode is view and we have the param then display param so we don't initialize the
form-version component which has logic to inject the current version into its
versions dropdown but only if we're new, editing, or cloning.
rancher/rancher#23478rancher/rancher#23465
The current kubernetes version wasn't being shown if it was no
longer a part of the supported versions when in view mode. Instead
the latest version was being displayed even if that wasn't what was
deployed. To resolve this we include the current version as one of
the choices if it's not present.
rancher/rancher#23465
When cloning a RKE template revision with overrides the values of the override
in the form were not reflected in the overrides section at the bottom of the
page because the alias on the question was never created.
rancher/rancher#23056
When editing a cluster that was created with cluster template
the cluster template revision couldn't be saved.
The revisionId was stored as a component member variable instead
of as a part of the model. It needed to be stored as part of the
model in order for the NewOrEdit to see the changes and save
them. I went ahead and referenced the model directly everywhere
in the component and removed the component member variable.
rancher/rancher#22920
Westly Wright
Westly Wright
shanewxy
Cody Jackson
Vincent Fiduccia
lvuch
n313893254
loganhz