mirror of https://github.com/cncf/techdocs.git
Update assessments/criteria.md: formatting change
Small formatting change.
This commit is contained in:
parent
07a8e4bfb3
commit
d323817698
|
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Is the documentation feature complete? (i.e., each product feature is documented
|
|||
* Are there any key features which are documented but missing task documentation?
|
||||
* Is the “happy path”/most common use case documented?
|
||||
Does task and tutorial content demonstrate atomicity and isolation of concerns? (Are tasks clearly named according to user goals?)
|
||||
*If the documentation does not suffice, is there a clear escalation path for users needing more help? (FAQ, Troubleshooting)
|
||||
* If the documentation does not suffice, is there a clear escalation path for users needing more help? (FAQ, Troubleshooting)
|
||||
* If the product exposes an API, is there a complete reference?
|
||||
* Is content up to date and accurate?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue