Update assessments/criteria.md: formatting change

Small formatting change.
This commit is contained in:
Nate W 2021-06-12 19:01:31 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent 07a8e4bfb3
commit d323817698
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Is the documentation feature complete? (i.e., each product feature is documented
* Are there any key features which are documented but missing task documentation?
* Is the “happy path”/most common use case documented?
Does task and tutorial content demonstrate atomicity and isolation of concerns? (Are tasks clearly named according to user goals?)
*If the documentation does not suffice, is there a clear escalation path for users needing more help? (FAQ, Troubleshooting)
* If the documentation does not suffice, is there a clear escalation path for users needing more help? (FAQ, Troubleshooting)
* If the product exposes an API, is there a complete reference?
* Is content up to date and accurate?