* Fix missing check list item "Due Diligence Review" in graduation template.
Also corrected inconsistency in "Review and acknowledgement of expectations for Sandbox projects
and requirements for moving forward through the CNCF Maturity levels". It's because the sandbox
requirements set expectations for how to be a CNCF project.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevinwzf0126@gmail.com>
* Reflect changes in operations/toc-templates/template-dd-pr-graduation.md
Remove requirement for tag recommendation. Ref: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/1814
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevinwzf0126@gmail.com>
* Reflect changes in operations/toc-templates/template-dd-pr-incubation.md
Remove requirement for tag recommendation. Ref: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/1814
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevinwzf0126@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevinwzf0126@gmail.com>
As per the discussion in the TOC meeting of 2025-01-07
(https://youtu.be/dTzpAw6lUT0?t=1627), add a set of
questions to the adopter interview template that will allow us to get a
better picture of how adopters see and use these maturity levels.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Rocha <rocha.porto@gmail.com>
Why:
* the TOC has fielded feedback from maintainers and TOC members, implemented changes to address issues, and needs to update our docs to reflect this.
This change address the need by:
* re-writing the triage to align with current process
* calling out the adopter form for adopter interview collection
* detail process for projects not yet ready to move
* linking the adopter interview form in the process/README
* updating process/README to inform on triaging and not-ready applications
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* it was requested the TOC describe used competencies for their work to better inform candidates
* it was requested the TOC explicitly state minimum throughput for Due Diligence
This change address the need by:
* Adding explicit throughput on line 39 for accountability
* Establish initial competencies at line 47
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* Several TOC members have expanded the question set from past DDs
This change address the need by:
* incorporating those additional questions
* restructure the ordering for better flow
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
I've simplified the wording to make it clear that the TOC can't override and the projects are responsible for their own governance.
Signed-off-by: Bill Mulligan <billmulligan516@gmail.com>
Why:
* the existing COI section in the DD does not cover impartiality needs or bias checks
This change address the need by:
* adding an Impartiality and COI section in the TOC onboarding
* adding structures to reduce bias section in TOC onboarding
* linking back to the DD-guide COI section for completeness
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* TOC members, to increase velocity, are expected to do an initial review of the project to determine if it is ready enough to continue due-diligence or if there is more work to be done.
This change address the need by:
* modifying the initial evaluation content with the new column and expectations.
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* TOC members, to increase velocity, are expected to do an initial review of the project to determine if it is ready enough to continue due-diligence or if there is more work to be done.
This change address the need by:
* modifying the initial evaluation content with the new column and expectations.
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
*
This change address the need by:
* correcting the interview template request with full URLs to make copy and pasting into email easier
* correcting broken links in the DD guide (with 1 spelling correction)
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
suggestions are grammatical, layout, punctuation, or other minor changes that do not change the content.
Co-authored-by: Lin Sun <lin.sun@solo.io>
Co-authored-by: Kevin Wang <kevinwzf0126@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <33327273+TheFoxAtWork@users.noreply.github.com>
Why:
* Need to introduce recommendations from the Moving Levels Task Force (mltf)
* Need to incorporate TOC adjustments and new streamline process
* previous PR had significant unresolvable merge conflicts
This change address the need by:
* Introduces Issue templates for graduation and incubation applications
* provides the TOC with a streamlined guide for due diligence
* move election-schedule into operations folder
* introduce TOC templates for DD process for improved consistentcy
* update the project process to a README reflecting these new changes
* remove older files that are no longer relevant or obsolete becuase of these changes
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Why:
* the moving levels task force provided recommendations to the TOC on improving the criteria clarity and overall process. This PR implements those recommendations based on TOC discussion.
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <themoxiefoxatwork@gmail.com>
Kevin Wang
Lin Sun
Bob Killen
Karena Angell
Chad Beaudin
Kevin Burns
Ali Ok
Ricardo Rocha
Emily Fox
Bill Mulligan
Amye Scavarda Perrin
Chris Aniszczyk
Emily Fox