29 KiB
title | description | weight | keywords | aliases | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Security | Describes Istio's authorization and authentication functionality. | 30 |
|
|
Istio aims to enhance the security of microservices and their communication without requiring service code changes. It is responsible for:
-
Providing each service with a strong identity that represents its role to enable interoperability across clusters and clouds
-
Securing service to service communication and end-user to service communication
-
Providing a key management system to automate key and certificate generation, distribution, rotation, and revocation
The following diagram shows Istio's security architecture, which includes three
primary components: identity, key management, and communication security. The
diagram shows how to use Istio to secure the service-to-service communication
between the frontend
service running as the frontend-team
service account
and the backend
service running as the backend-team
service account. Istio
supports services running on Kubernetes containers, virtual machines, and
bare-metal machines.
{{< image width="60%" ratio="52.44%" link="./auth.svg" alt="Components making up the Istio security model." caption="Istio Security Architecture" >}}
As illustrated in the diagram, Istio uses secret volume mounts to deliver keys and certificates from Citadel to Kubernetes containers. For services running on VMs or bare-metal machines, we introduce a node agent, which is a process running on each VM or bare-metal machine. The node agent generates the private key and the CSR (Certificate Signing Request) locally, sends the CSR to Citadel for signing, and delivers the generated certificate together with the private key to Envoy.
Mutual TLS authentication
Identity
Istio uses Kubernetes service accounts to identify who runs the service:
-
A service account in Istio has the format:
spiffe://\<_domain_\>/ns/\<_namespace_>/sa/\<_serviceaccount_\>
.- Replace
_domain_
with_cluster.local_
. We will support customization of domain in the near future. - Replace
_namespace_
with the namespace of the Kubernetes service account. - Replace
_serviceaccount_
with the Kubernetes service account name.
- Replace
-
A service account is the identity or role a workload runs as. The service account represents that workload's privileges. For systems requiring strong security, neither a random string, such as a service name, label, etc., nor the deployed binary should identify the amount of privilege for a workload. For example, let's say we have a workload pulling data from a multi-tenant database. If Alice runs this workload, she pulls a different set of data than if Bob runs this workload.
-
To enable strong security policies, service accounts offer the flexibility to identify a machine, a user, a workload, or a group of workloads. Different workloads can even run as the same service account.
-
The service account a workload runs as won't change during the lifetime of the workload.
-
With domain name constraint, you can ensure service account uniqueness.
Communication security
Istio tunnels service-to-service communication through the client side Envoy and the server side Envoy. Istio secures end-to-end communication via:
-
Local TCP connections between the service and Envoy.
-
Mutual TLS connections between proxies.
-
Secure Naming: during the handshake process, the client side Envoy checks that the service account the server side certificate provided is allowed to run the target service.
Key management
Istio supports services running on Kubernetes pods, virtual machines, and bare-metal machines. We use different key provisioning mechanisms for each scenario.
For services running on Kubernetes pods, the per-cluster Citadel, acting as Certificate Authority, automates the key and certificate management process. Citadel mainly performs four critical operations:
-
Generate a SPIFFE key and certificate pair for each service account
-
Distribute a key and certificate pair to each pod according to the service account
-
Rotate keys and certificates periodically
-
Revoke a specific key and certificate pair when necessary
For services running on VMs or bare-metal machines, Citadel performs the above four operations together with node agents.
Workflow
The Istio security workflow consists of two phases: deployment and runtime. The deployment phase is different for the workflow in Kubernetes and for the workflow in VMs or bare-metal machines. However, once the key and certificate are deployed, the runtime phase is the same. The following sections briefly cover the workflow.
Deployment phase in Kubernetes
-
Citadel watches the Kubernetes API Server.
-
Citadel creates a SPIFFE key and certificate pair for each of the existing and new service accounts.
-
Citadel sends them to the API Server.
-
When a pod is created, the API Server mounts the key and certificate pair according to the service account using Kubernetes secrets.
-
Pilot generates the configuration file with the proper key, certificate, and secure naming information, which defines what service account(s) can run a certain service, and passes the configuration on to Envoy.
Deployment phase in VMs or bare-metal Machines
-
Citadel creates a gRPC service to take the CSR.
-
The node agent creates the private key and CSR
-
The node agent sends the CSR to Citadel for signing.
-
Citadel validates the credentials carried in the CSR
-
Citadel signs the CSR to generate the certificate.
-
The node agent sends both, the certificate received from Citadel and the private key, to Envoy.
-
The above CSR process repeats periodically for rotation.
Runtime phase
-
The outbound traffic from a client service is rerouted to its local Envoy.
-
The client side Envoy starts a mutual TLS handshake with the server side Envoy. During the handshake, it also does a secure naming check to verify that the service account presented in the server certificate can run the server service.
-
The client side Envoy and the server side Envoy establish a mutual TLS connection.
-
The client side Envoy forwards the traffic to the server side Envoy
-
The server side Envoy forwards the traffic to the server service through local TCP connections.
Best practices
In this section, we provide a few deployment guidelines and discuss a real-world scenario.
Deployment guidelines
If there are multiple service operators, a.k.a.
SREs),
deploying different services in a medium- or large-size cluster, we recommend
creating a separate
namespace
for each SRE team to isolate their access. For example, you can create a
team1-ns
namespace for team1
, and team2-ns
namespace for team2
, such
that both teams can't access each other's services.
{{< warning_icon >}} If Citadel is compromised, all its managed keys and certificates in the cluster may be exposed. We strongly recommend running Citadel in a dedicated namespace, for example
istio-citadel-ns
, to restrict access to the cluster to only administrators.
Example
Let us consider a three-tier application with three services: photo-frontend
,
photo-backend
, and datastore
. The photo SRE team manages the
photo-frontend
and photo-backend
services while the datastore SRE team
manages the datastore
service. The photo-frontend
can access
photo-backend
, and the photo-backend
service can access datastore
.
However, the photo-frontend
service cannot access datastore
.
In this scenario, a cluster administrator creates three namespaces:
istio-citadel-ns
, photo-ns
, and datastore-ns
. The administrator has
access to all namespaces and each team only has access to its own namespace.
The photo SRE team creates two service accounts to run photo-frontend
and
photo-backend
respectively in the photo-ns
namespace. The datastore SRE
team creates one service account to run the datastore
service in the
datastore-ns
namespace. Moreover, we need to enforce the service access
control in Istio Mixer such that
photo-frontend
cannot access datastore.
In this setup, Citadel can provide both key management and certificate management for all namespaces and isolate microservice deployments from each other.
Authentication
Istio provides two types of authentication:
-
Transport authentication, also known as service-to-service authentication: verifies the direct client making the connection. Istio offers mutual TLS as a full stack solution for transport authentication. You can easily turn on this feature without requiring service code changes. This solution:
- Provides each service with a strong identity representing its role to enable interoperability across clusters and clouds.
- Secures service-to-service communication and end-user-to-service communication.
- Provides a key management system to automate key and certificate generation, distribution, rotation, and revocation.
-
Origin authentication, also known as end-user authentication: verifies the original client making the request as an end-user or device. Istio supports authentication with JSON Web Token (JWT) validation.
Authentication architecture
You can specify authentication requirements for services receiving requests in
an Istio mesh using authentication policies. The mesh operator uses .yaml
files to specify the policies. The policies are saved in the Istio
configuration storage once deployed. Pilot, the Istio controller, watches the
configuration storage. Upon any policy changes, Pilot translates the new policy
to the appropriate configuration telling the Envoy sidecar proxy how to perform
the required authentication mechanisms. Pilot may fetch the public key and
attach it to the configuration for JWT validation. Alternatively, Pilot
provides the path to the keys and certificates the Istio system manages and
installs them to the application pod for mutual TLS. You can find more info in
the PKI and identity section.
Istio sends configurations to the targeted endpoints asynchronously. Once the
proxy receives the configuration, the new authentication requirement takes
effect immediately on that pod.
Client services, those that send requests, are responsible for following the necessary authentication mechanism. For origin authentication (JWT), the application is responsible for acquiring and attaching the JWT credential to the request. For mutual TLS, Istio provides a destination rule. The operator can use the destination rule to instruct client proxies to make initial connections using TLS with the certificates expected on the server side. You can find out more about how mutual TLS works in Istio in PKI and identity section.
{{< image width="60%" ratio="67.12%" link="./authn.svg" caption="Authentication Architecture" >}}
Istio outputs identities with both types of authentication, as well as other claims in the credential if applicable, to the next layer: authorization. Additionally, operators can specify which identity, either from transport or origin authentication, should Istio use as ‘the principal’.
Authentication policies
This section provides more details about how Istio authentication policies
work. As you’ll remember from the Architecture section,
authentication policies apply to requests that a service receives. To
specify client-side authentication rules in mutual TLS, you need to specify the
TLSSettings
in the DestinationRule
. You can find more information in our
TLS settings reference docs.
Like other Istio configuration, you can specify authentication policies in
.yaml
files. You deploy policies using kubectl
.
The following example authentication policy specifies that transport
authentication for the reviews
service must use mutual TLS:
{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "authentication.istio.io/v1alpha1" kind: "Policy" metadata: name: "reviews" spec: targets:
- name: reviews peers:
- mtls: {} {{< /text >}}
Policy storage scope
Istio can store authentication policies in namespace-scope or mesh-scope storage:
-
Mesh-scope policy is specified with a value of
"MeshPolicy"
for thekind
field and the name"default"
. For example:{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "authentication.istio.io/v1alpha1" kind: "MeshPolicy" metadata: name: "default" spec: peers: - mtls: {} {{< /text >}}
-
Namespace-scope policy is specified with a value of
"Policy"
for thekind
field and a specified namespace. If unspecified, the default namespace is used. For example for namespacens1
:{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "authentication.istio.io/v1alpha1" kind: "Policy" metadata: name: "default" namespace: "ns1" spec: peers: - mtls: {} {{< /text >}}
Policies in the namespace-scope storage can only affect services in the same
namespace. Policies in mesh-scope can affect all services in the mesh. To
prevent conflict and misuse, only one policy can be defined in mesh-scope
storage. That policy must be named default
and have an empty
targets:
section. You can find more information on our
target selectors section.
Kubernetes currently implements the Istio configuration on Custom Resource
Definitions (CRDs). These CRDs correspond to namespace-scope and
cluster-scope CRDs
and automatically inherit access protection via the
Kubernetes RBAC. You can read more on the
Kubernetes CRD documentation
Target selectors
An authentication policy’s targets specify the service or services to which the
policy applies. The following example shows a targets:
section specifying
that the policy applies to:
- The
product-page
service on any port. - The reviews service on port
9000
.
{{< text yaml >}} targets:
- name: product-page
- name: reviews
ports:
- number: 9000 {{< /text >}}
If you don't provide a targets:
section, Istio matches the policy to all
services in the storage scope of the policy. Thus, the targets:
section can
help you specify the scope of the policies:
-
Mesh-wide policy: A policy defined in the mesh-scope storage with no target selector section. There can be at most one mesh-wide policy in the mesh.
-
Namespace-wide policy: A policy defined in the namespace-scope storage with name
default
and no target selector section. There can be at most one namespace-wide policy per namespace. -
Service-specific policy: a policy defined in the namespace-scope storage, with non-empty target selector section. A namespace can have zero, one, or many service-specific policies.
For each service, Istio applies the narrowest matching policy. The order is: service-specific > namespace-wide > mesh-wide. If more than one service-specific policy matches a service, Istio selects one of them at random. Operators must avoid such conflicts when configuring their policies.
To enforce uniqueness for mesh-wide and namespace-wide policies, Istio accepts
only one authentication policy per mesh and one authentication policy per
namespace. Istio also requires mesh-wide and namespace-wide policies to have
the specific name default
.
Transport authentication
The peers:
section defines the authentication methods and associated
parameters supported for transport authentication in a policy. The section can
list more than one method and only one method must be satisfied for the
authentication to pass. However, as of the Istio 0.7 release, the only
transport authentication method currently supported is mutual TLS. If you don't
need transport authentication, skip this section entirely.
The following example shows the peers:
section enabling transport
authentication using mutual TLS.
{{< text yaml >}} peers:
- mtls: {} {{< /text >}}
Currently, the mutual TLS setting doesn’t require any parameters. Hence,
-mtls: {}
, - mtls:
or - mtls: null
declarations are treated the same. In
the future, the mutual TLS setting may carry arguments to provide different
mutual TLS implementations.
Origin authentication
The origins:
section defines authentication methods and associated parameters
supported for origin authentication. Istio only supports JWT origin
authentication. However, a policy can list multiple JWTs by different issuers.
Similar to peer authentication, only one of the listed methods must be
satisfied for the authentication to pass.
The following example policy specifies an origins:
section for origin
authentication that accepts JWTs issued by Google:
{{< text yaml >}} origins:
- jwt: issuer: "https://accounts.google.com" jwksUri: "https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v3/certs" {{< /text >}}
Principal binding
The principal binding key-value pair defines the principal authentication for a
policy. By default, Istio uses the authentication configured in the peers:
section. If no authentication is configured in the peers:
section, Istio
leaves the authentication unset. Policy writers can overwrite this behavior
with the USE_ORIGIN
value. This value configures Istio to use the origin's
authentication as the principal authentication instead. In future, we will
support conditional binding, for example: USE_PEER
when peer is X, otherwise
USE_ORIGIN
.
The following example shows the principalBinding
key with a value of
USE_ORIGIN
:
{{< text yaml >}} principalBinding: USE_ORIGIN {{< /text >}}
Updating authentication policies
You can change an authentication policy at any time and Istio pushes the change to the endpoints almost in real time. However, Istio can't guarantee that all endpoints receive a new policy at the same time. The following are recommendations to avoid disruption when updating your authentication policies:
- To enable or disable mutual TLS: Use a temporary policy with a
mode:
key and aPERMISSIVE
value. This configures receiving services to accept both types of traffic: plain text and TLS. Thus, no request is dropped. Once all clients switch to the expected protocol, with or without mutual TLS, you can replace thePERMISSIVE
policy with the final policy. For more information, visit the Mutual TLS Migration tutorial.
{{< text yaml >}} peers:
-
mTLS: mode: PERMISSIVE {{< /text >}}
-
For JWT authentication migration: requests should contain new JWT before changing policy. Once the server side has completely switched to the new policy, the old JWT, if there is any, can be removed. Client applications need to be changed for these changes to work.
Authorization
Istio's authorization feature - also known as Role-based Access Control (RBAC)
-
provides namespace-level, service-level, and method-level access control for services in an Istio Mesh. It features:
-
Role-Based semantics, which are simple and easy to use.
-
Service-to-service and end-user-to-service authorization.
-
Flexibility through custom properties support, for example conditions, in roles and role-bindings.
-
High performance, as Istio authorization is enforced natively on Envoy.
Authorization architecture
{{< image width="90%" ratio="56.25%" link="./authz.svg" alt="Istio Authorization" caption="Istio Authorization Architecture" >}}
The above diagram shows the basic Istio authorization architecture. Operators
specify Istio authorization policies using .yaml
files. Once deployed, Istio
saves the policies in the Istio Config Store
.
Pilot watches for changes to Istio authorization policies. It fetches the updated authorization policies if it sees any changes. Pilot distributes Istio authorization policies to the Envoy proxies that are co-located with the service instances.
Each Envoy proxy runs an authorization engine that authorizes requests at
runtime. When a request comes to the proxy, the authorization engine evaluates
the request context against the current authorization policies, and returns the
authorization result, ALLOW
or DENY
.
Enabling authorization
You enable Istio Authorization using a RbacConfig
object. The RbacConfig
object is a mesh-wide singleton with a fixed name value of default
. You can
only use one RbacConfig
instance in the mesh. Like other Istio configuration
objects, RbacConfig
is defined as a
Kubernetes CustomResourceDefinition
(CRD) object.
In the RbacConfig
object, the operator can specify a mode
value, which can
be:
OFF
: Istio authorization is disabled.ON
: Istio authorization is enabled for all services in the mesh.ON_WITH_INCLUSION
: Istio authorization is enabled only for services and namespaces specified in theinclusion
field.ON_WITH_EXCLUSION
: Istio authorization is enabled for all services in the mesh except the services and namespaces specified in theexclusion
field.
In the following example, Istio authorization is enabled for the default
namespace.
{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "config.istio.io/v1alpha2" kind: RbacConfig metadata: name: default namespace: istio-system spec: mode: ON_WITH_INCLUSION inclusion: namespaces: ["default"] {{< /text >}}
Authorization policy
To configure an Istio authorization policy, you specify a ServiceRole
and
ServiceRoleBinding
. Like other Istio configuration objects, they are
defined as
Kubernetes CustomResourceDefinition
(CRD) objects.
ServiceRole
defines a group of permissions to access services.ServiceRoleBinding
grants aServiceRole
to particular subjects, such as a user, a group, or a service.
The combination of ServiceRole
and ServiceRoleBinding
specifies: who is
allowed to do what under which conditions. Specifically:
- who refers to the
subjects:
section inServiceRoleBinding
. - what refers to the
permissions:
section inServiceRole
. - which conditions refers to the
conditions:
section you can specify with the Istio attributes in eitherServiceRole
orServiceRoleBinding
.
ServiceRole
A ServiceRole
specification includes a list of rules:
, AKA permissions.
Each rule has the following standard fields:
-
services:
A list of service names. You can set the value to*
to include all services in the specified namespace. -
methods:
A list of HTTP method names, for permissions on gRPC requests, the HTTP verb is alwaysPOST
. You can set the value to*
to include all HTTP methods. -
paths:
HTTP paths or gRPC methods. The gRPC methods must be in the form of/packageName.serviceName/methodName
and are case sensitive.
A ServiceRole
specification only applies to the namespace specified in the
metadata
section. The services:
and methods:
fields are required in a
rule. paths:
is optional. If a rule is not specified or if it is set to *
,
it applies to any instance.
The example below shows a simple role: service-admin
, which has full access
to all services in the default
namespace.
{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "rbac.istio.io/v1alpha1" kind: ServiceRole metadata: name: service-admin namespace: default spec: rules:
- services: [""] methods: [""] {{< /text >}}
Here is another role: products-viewer
, which has read, "GET"
and "HEAD"
,
access to the service products.default.svc.cluster.local
in the default
namespace.
{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "rbac.istio.io/v1alpha1" kind: ServiceRole metadata: name: products-viewer namespace: default spec: rules:
- services: ["products.default.svc.cluster.local"] methods: ["GET", "HEAD"] {{< /text >}}
In addition, we support prefix matching and suffix matching for all the fields
in a rule. For example, you can define a tester
role with the following
permissions in the default
namespace:
- Full access to all services with prefix
"test-*"
, for example:test-bookstore
,test-performance
,test-api.default.svc.cluster.local
. - Read (
"GET"
) access to all paths with"*/reviews"
suffix, for example:/books/reviews
,/events/booksale/reviews
,/reviews
in servicebookstore.default.svc.cluster.local
.
{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "rbac.istio.io/v1alpha1" kind: ServiceRole metadata: name: tester namespace: default spec: rules:
- services: ["test-"] methods: [""]
- services: ["bookstore.default.svc.cluster.local"] paths: ["*/reviews"] methods: ["GET"] {{< /text >}}
In a ServiceRole
, the combination of namespace:
+ services:
+ paths:
+
methods:
defines how a service or services are accessed. In some
situations, you may need to specify additional conditions for your rules. For
example, a rule may only apply to a certain version of a service, or only
apply to services with a specific label, like "foo"
. You can easily
specify these conditions using constraints:
.
For example, the following ServiceRole
definition adds a constraint that
request.headers["version"]
is either "v1"
or "v2"
extending the previous
products-viewer
role. The supported key:
values of a constraint are listed
in the constraints and properties page.
In the case that the attribute is a map
, for example request.headers
, the
key
is an entry in the map, for example request.headers["version"]
.
{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "rbac.istio.io/v1alpha1" kind: ServiceRole metadata: name: products-viewer-version namespace: default spec: rules:
- services: ["products.default.svc.cluster.local"]
methods: ["GET", "HEAD"]
constraints:
- key: request.headers[version] values: ["v1", "v2"] {{< /text >}}
ServiceRoleBinding
A ServiceRoleBinding
specification includes two parts:
roleRef
refers to aServiceRole
resource in the same namespace.- A list of
subjects:
that are assigned to the role.
You can either explicitly specify a subject with a user:
or with a set of
properties:
. A property in a ServiceRoleBinding
subject is similar to
a constraint in a ServiceRole
specification. A property also lets you use
conditions to specify a set of accounts assigned to this role. It contains a
key:
and its allowed values. The supported key:
values of a constraint
are listed in the
constraints and properties page.
The following example shows a ServiceRoleBinding
named
test-binding-products
, which binds two subjects to the ServiceRole
named
"product-viewer"
and has the following subjects:
- A service account representing service a,
"service-account-a"
. - A service account representing the Ingress service
"istio-ingress-service-account"
and where the JWT"email"
claim is"a@foo.com"
.
{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "rbac.istio.io/v1alpha1" kind: ServiceRoleBinding metadata: name: test-binding-products namespace: default spec: subjects:
- user: "service-account-a"
- user: "istio-ingress-service-account" properties: request.auth.claims[email]: "a@foo.com" roleRef: kind: ServiceRole name: "products-viewer" {{< /text >}}
In case you want to make a services publicly accessible, you can set the
subject
to user: "*"
. This value assigns the ServiceRole
to all users
and services, for example:
{{< text yaml >}} apiVersion: "rbac.istio.io/v1alpha1" kind: ServiceRoleBinding metadata: name: binding-products-allusers namespace: default spec: subjects:
- user: "*" roleRef: kind: ServiceRole name: "products-viewer" {{< /text >}}